![]() ![]() Windows 10 is always patched to the most recent version, and we use the latest compatible version of the graphics driver recommended by the card maker for the card being tested. We use this testbed to run a variety of synthetic tests (which simulate graphical stresses or game processes), as well as actual in-game benchmarks that report results in frame rates or game-specific scores. The 2020 version of this machine is equipped with an Asus ROG Maximus XII Hero Wi-Fi motherboard, an Intel Core i9-10900K CPU, 16GB of G.Skill TridentZ RAM, a 2TB Samsung SSD 870 QVO SSD, and a Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1,050-watt power supply (PSU). Other benchmarking tools are found inside of leading, AAA-grade video game titles you may recognize, put into place by their respective developers.Īll graphics cards that come through the PCMag offices are tested on a custom Windows 10 desktop PC we built expressly for the purpose of putting GPUs through their paces. For that reason, we use a variety of standardized benchmarks to test video cards, some of which were developed for the sole purpose of pushing discrete graphics components to their limits. With so many graphics cards to choose from, we have to ensure that our testing regimen remains consistent with each one that we review. Here at PCMag, we run the numbers on every graphics card we get our hands on to determine which models are the most capable. But as you're shopping around for video cards, it is crucial to consider the performance you get for the amount of money you're shelling out. Whenever you're operating a PC to render real-time graphics, a dedicated graphics card will prove itself useful. Whatever you call them, there's no denying the important role these components play for gamers, not to mention workstation users and productivity-focused folks with multiple displays. Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security Software.You can join the discussion on Intel's ARC A380 desktop GPU benchmarks on the OC3D Forums. Until then, these early Chinese benchmarks are all we have. We will know more when Intel's graphics cards are available in the West and we are able to test these graphics cards ourselves. That said, things may change as Intel's GPU driver mature. Right now, the performance of Intel's ARC A380 graphics card is unimpressive. That said, all three of these graphics cards are likely VRAM limited, as all of them have less than 8GB of VRAM, with the AMD GPUs having 4GB while the Intel A380 has 6GB. Yes, these performance levels are nothing compared to Nvidia's RTX 3050, but Intel has handily beaten AMD's RX 6400 and RX 6500 XT. In 3DMARK Port Royal, Intel has delivered impressive levels of ray tracing performance. If only these 3DMARK results were representative of the GPU's gaming performance. Intel is able to best AMD's RX 6500 XT here, but when real world gaming performance is below an RX 6400, it simply looks like Intel has optimised its drivers exceptionally well for the 3DMARK test suite, and that gaming performance has fallen behind. In 3DMARK Time Spy, a Synthetic benchmark, Intel's ARC A380 fares better against is AMD and Nvidia counterparts. ![]() ![]() In real gaming workloads, the performance of Intel's ARC A380 has fallen short of its AMD/Nvidia rivals. While it is worth remembering that Intel's ARC A380 should be the company's least powerful ARC A-series desktop graphics card, it is hard not to be disappointed by these results. In the game benchmarks below, which are presented in the order listed above, we can see that Intel's ARC A380 has failed to surpass the performance of AMD's Radeon RX 6400 and Nvidia's GT 1650, neither of which are considered powerful gaming graphics cards. Tests include 3DMARK Port Royal, the ray tracing benchmark, 3DMARK Time Spy, and a collection of games that include League of Legends, Grand Theft Auto V, PUBG, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5, and Red Dead Redemption 2. Intel's ARC A380 graphics card is now available in China, allowing independent reviewers to have a look at Intel's first ARC series discrete GPU. Intel's A380 fails to impress in early benchmarks ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |